Tag: integral philosophy

Knowing the Absolute from Every Angle

The Absolute cannot be grasped by standing in a single place.

Any attempt to reduce it to one perspective—personal, relational, objective, mystical, or philosophical, inevitably distorts it. What gets mistaken for ultimate truth is often just a partial orientation mistaken for the whole.

To know the Absolute at full capacity requires more than a peak realization. It requires total perspectival inclusion.

From the first person, the Absolute is immediate presence; being as oneself. From the second person, it appears as intimacy, devotion, and encounter. From the third person, it becomes structure, law, and observable order. Each of these reveals something true, yet none is sufficient on its own.

A deeper shift occurs when perspective itself is examined.

The fourth perspective dissolves the centre. Experience continues, but ownership drops away. Awareness no longer belongs to anyone. Reality is no longer happening to a self or for a self. Knowing remains, yet no knower can be found.

Then even this gives way.

The fifth perspective removes the need for a field, a witness, or an explanatory ground altogether. The question of where experience occurs loses relevance. Nothing collapses. Nothing transcends. The demand for a final position simply falls apart.

At this point, God is no longer approached as an object of belief, a presence to merge with, or an awareness to stabilize in. God is known as that which remains valid across every mode of knowing without requiring allegiance to any of them.

This knowing must also scale developmentally.

Ego-centric concern gives way to ethnocentric identity, which yields to world-centric ethics, which eventually opens into kosmocentric inclusion. Each stage expands care, responsibility, and comprehension. None invalidates the others. Each must be seen through without being erased.

The same applies to the I, We, It, and Its dimensions of reality. Subjective experience, shared meaning, objective systems, and interobjective networks all reveal aspects of the Absolute. Excluding any one of them creates imbalance. Absolutizing any one of them creates delusion.

States of consciousness contribute their own disclosures. Waking reveals form and function. Dreaming reveals imagination and symbolic depth. Dreamless sleep reveals the absence of content. The witness reveals continuity without identity. Nonduality reveals the inseparability of all of it. None of these states owns the truth. Each exposes a different facet of what cannot be reduced.

Lines of development add further resolution. Cognitive clarity without emotional maturity distorts insight. Moral development without metaphysical depth flattens reality. Spiritual realization without psychological integration fragments embodiment. The Absolute is not known through excellence in one line alone.

Enlightenment, then, is not a single realization frozen in time.

It is the capacity to recognize the Absolute through every perspective without mistaking any perspective for the Absolute itself.

Such knowing does not claim finality. It does not announce arrival. It does not need to defend itself. It functions fluidly; able to speak personally, relationally, objectively, impersonally, and without position; depending on what the moment requires.

God is not found by climbing higher.
God is known by nothing being excluded.

Morgan O. Smith

AI for Wellness and Spirituality Summit

February 9 & 10, 2026

https://aiforwellnessandspirituality.com/mosm

What Appears Is Never What It Is

Nothing arrives as itself. What shows up as form, event, thought, or identity is already a veil; yet not a veil hiding something else. Appearance is the way the unseen speaks. Expression is not a mask placed over truth; expression is the activity of truth.

Time does not obscure reality. Time is one of its gestures. Space does not distance anything from what is real. Space is a mode of presentation. Every person, object, moment, and movement stands as a precise articulation of what cannot be isolated, possessed, or fully perceived.

What remains unseen is not absent. It is unlocatable.

The true nature does not sit behind phenomena waiting to be uncovered. It never retreats from what appears. Every disguise is complete. Every expression is equal. No hierarchy of forms exists at the level where all forms arise.

Archaic consciousness does not miss truth; it reflects truth as survival and immediacy. Magical consciousness does not distort reality; it reveals participation and symbolic power. Mythic consciousness does not fabricate meaning; it expresses coherence through story and order. Modern consciousness does not reduce the world; it articulates precision, structure, and agency. Postmodern consciousness does not fragment truth; it exposes hidden assumptions and unspoken exclusions. Integral consciousness does not transcend the earlier forms by negation; it includes them as necessary articulations. Super-integral awareness does not stand above the whole; it recognizes the whole as already complete.

No stage corrects another. Each stage speaks a different dialect of the same unspeakable source.

Egocentric, ethnocentric, worldcentric, and Kosmocentric orientations do not compete for validity. Each reflects how the whole experiences itself through scale and concern. What feels limited at one level becomes coherence at another, without contradiction.

Subjective experience does not oppose objective reality. Intersubjective meaning does not negate interior depth. Interobjective systems do not erase lived presence. These are not separate territories. They are simultaneous dimensions of one unfolding.

Qualities appear; love, fear, intelligence, inertia, clarity, confusion. Attributes seem to form; shape, duration, movement, pattern. Absence also appears; emptiness, silence, negation. None of these define the source. None of these exclude it.

The true nature cannot be seen because it never stands apart from seeing. It cannot be grasped because it never stands opposite grasping. Every attempt to point to it becomes another appearance, and that appearance is already sufficient.

Nothing is hiding. Nothing is missing. Nothing needs to be revealed.

What is appearing is exactly what reality looks like when it expresses itself without needing to explain.

Morgan O. Smith

AI for Wellness and Spirituality Summit

February 9 & 10, 2026

https://aiforwellnessandspirituality.com/mosm

When All Paths Become Transparent to Truth

At the super-integral level, perception no longer filters reality through allegiance. Vision widens beyond affiliation, beyond the need to defend a worldview or elevate one tradition over another. What becomes visible is not a synthesis manufactured by intellect, but a recognition born of depth: each religion, philosophy, system, culture, and tradition is responding to the same mystery from a different angle of approach.

Truth does not belong to any single framework. Frameworks belong to truth.

Each system carries a partial articulation shaped by time, language, geography, psychology, and collective need. When approached from within their own context, these systems often appear contradictory. When seen from depth, they are complementary gestures pointing toward what cannot be fully captured. Disagreement dissolves not because differences disappear, but because the compulsion to absolutize any one perspective falls away.

Super-integral awareness does not flatten distinctions. It clarifies them. Christianity speaks the language of incarnation and surrender. Buddhism articulates emptiness and liberation from grasping. Advaita reveals the non-separation of Self and reality. Indigenous traditions speak through land, ancestry, and cyclical intelligence. Science maps measurable patterns of the cosmos. Psychology explores the architecture of the inner world. Each is precise within its domain. None is sufficient alone.

At this level, conflict between systems is understood as a category error. Arguments arise when symbols are mistaken for the reality they reference. Beliefs are defended as ends rather than as lenses. Super-integral seeing restores humility to knowing. It recognizes that every map is provisional and every language incomplete.

What shifts most profoundly is identity. No longer rooted in belief structures, identity relaxes into presence itself. From there, one can enter any tradition without needing to convert, reject, or appropriate. A Christian prayer, a Sufi poem, a Zen koan, a Vedantic inquiry, or a scientific equation can all be met directly, without friction. Meaning reveals itself through resonance rather than comparison.

This level of seeing does not erase devotion. It deepens it. Devotion moves from loyalty to a form toward reverence for the source animating all forms. Practice becomes fluid, responsive, and contextual. Wisdom expresses itself through discernment rather than doctrine.

Super-integral awareness is not an achievement of accumulation. It arises through subtraction, through the gradual release of identification with position, certainty, and hierarchy. What remains is a capacity to listen deeply, to recognize truth wherever it appears, and to allow contradiction to coexist without collapse.

Here, unity is not an idea. It is a lived recognition that difference is how the infinite explores itself.

Morgan O. Smith

Get Your Free Copy of My Book, Bodhi in the Brain!

https://subscribepage.io/oTSZQu

∆∞Ο and the Nondual Nature of Enlightenment

Inspired by the work of Alexander Ngu and Amaya Odilon Kosso — “Intelligent Transformation: General Intelligence Theory” (2024)

Humanity has long searched for a bridge between consciousness and cosmos, between the ineffable pulse of awareness and the measurable rhythms of reality. Alexander Ngu and Amaya Odilon Kosso may have drawn that bridge with their revolutionary General Intelligence Theory (GIT), proposing a universal abstraction known as ∆∞Ο;  the triarchic principle of the infinitesimal (∆), the infinite (∞), and the finite (Ο).

Their insight dismantles the old notion of equality as the foundation of understanding. The equal sign, they argue, limits the sensitivity of thought to the subtler play of transformation. Equality is static — it implies stillness between two mirrored sides. Transformation, however, is alive. It breathes through every exchange, allowing one form to become another without contradiction. ∆∞Ο is the language of that breath; the patternless rhythm by which energy becomes matter, idea becomes awareness, and self becomes all.

If you’ve read any of my past work, you’d know that my main focus is spiritual enlightenment. The moment I read their paper, I could conceptually see how their work may apply to my personal direct experience of The All. Though I could be jumping at this prematurely, my intuition said otherwise. I got the same feeling when I first discovered Bill Harris’ work regarding low-carrier frequency brainwave entrainment, Marko Rodin’s work in Vortex Based Mathematics, and my teacher and colleague, Ken Wilber’s work in Integral Theory. So far, I’ve never been wrong.

The spiritual implications are profound. The infinitesimal (∆) reflects the fleeting pulse of perception; each thought, sensation, or breath that rises and dissolves. The infinite (∞) mirrors the boundless consciousness in which those movements occur. The finite (Ο) represents the manifest world, the circle of appearances that seems to contain experience. The realization that ∆, ∞, and Ο are not separate but continuous is the essence of enlightenment. Awareness awakens to its own structure; the one relation that holds all opposites in seamless reciprocity.

This triarchic model suggests that intelligence, in its most universal sense, is the self-recognition of transformation. Every shift of perception, every oscillation between thought and stillness, is the cosmos contemplating itself through the medium of form. The so-called “theory of everything” becomes not a formula etched in numbers, but a recognition that everything is the formula; a living geometry of being that reconciles complexity, dimensionality, and spatiality in one infinite act of awareness.

Spiritual awakening, through this lens, is not an event within time but the cessation of all resistance to transformation. The individual dissolves into the very process that sustains existence; a process that requires no computation, no passage of time, no distance traversed. Enlightenment, therefore, is not achieved; it is realized as the zero-point of transformation, where the infinitesimal and infinite converge in perfect immediacy.

Ngu and Kosso’s ∆∞Ο does more than redefine intelligence; it redefines reality itself. It reveals that consciousness and existence are not two domains awaiting reconciliation, but one relational field eternally transforming within its own awareness. The ancient mystics called this unity Brahman, Tao, or the Absolute. The scientists now call it General Intelligence. Both are describing the same ineffable truth: that the universe is awake, and you are its knowing.

Morgan O. Smith

Get Your Free Copy of My Book, Bodhi in the Brain!

https://subscribepage.io/oTSZQu

Universal Love

The Ever-Expanding Heart

Love that requires no condition, no reflection, no return; this is the highest state of consciousness. Universal Love is not sentimental or selective. It does not operate within the confines of personality, preference, or perception. It sees through every distinction and recognizes only itself.

This is love as total awareness. It loves because there is nothing else to do. It gives without the idea of giving. It embraces without needing to hold. It penetrates every boundary of selfhood and dissolves all opposites into a seamless field of being. Even the idea of “others” fades when this love awakens, for the one who loves and the one who is loved are found to be the same.

Such love is not weak; it is fearless. It does not protect itself because it knows it cannot be harmed. It sacrifices willingly because it understands there is no loss in unity. Every act, every gesture, every breath becomes an expression of this boundless compassion that celebrates existence as itself.

Universal Love is not attained through effort. It is remembered through surrender. The heart expands until it no longer has edges. What remains is a radiant stillness that loves without reason, without measure, and without end.

Morgan O. Smith

Get Your Free Copy of My Book, Bodhi in the Brain!

https://subscribepage.io/oTSZQu

The Stage Beyond Oneness

When Even the Kosmos Falls Away

There comes a point when even the most expansive vision collapses—not from error, but from completion.

On the path of awakening, seekers often journey from the confines of selfhood to a union with all things. Ego dissolves, and what once felt separate now reveals itself as interconnected. Compassion grows. The heart blooms for all beings. One begins to live for the Whole.

But for some, even this union becomes too crowded.

Even the notion of “One” becomes too noisy.

This is the threshold where Kosmocentric awareness—a state of profound unity with all life and existence—gives way to something quieter, more radical. Not a deeper connection, but the quiet erasure of the very need for connection. Not expansion, but the release of expansion itself.

This is acentric awareness.

Not centered on the self.

Not centered on the world.

Not even centered on the All.

Acentricity does not point toward identification with something greater. It simply makes no identification at all. No vantage point. No witness. No center from which to perceive. It does not declare that all is One—it no longer needs such declarations. Truth requires no thesis here.

Reality just appears.

Without context.

Without a watcher.

Without the echo of a thought that says, “I am aware.”

Call it suchness.

Call it the absence of everything, shimmering as everything.

Call it the stillness that doesn’t oppose movement, because it was never still.

This isn’t transcendence. It isn’t detachment. It isn’t a stance. It’s the utter end of stance—the collapse of spiritual architecture, without the rubble. It doesn’t reject the world. It simply no longer perceives it as something to accept or reject.

And what does such a life look like?

Unremarkable.

Utterly simple.

Perhaps quiet, perhaps animated.

But always empty of claim, even the claim to be empty.

There are no teachings left to transmit. Not because truth has been mastered, but because it was never a possession. No more climbing. No more seeking. No more union. Not even rest—because rest would imply effort once existed.

This is the unborn silence that does not speak—not even through the mouths of sages.

It appears as a leaf falling, as someone stirring soup, as the sound of a crow at dusk.

And you might pass by it without knowing.

Because it doesn’t need to be known.

It just is.

And it is no one’s.

Morgan O. Smith

Get Your Free Copy of My Book, Bodhi in the Brain!

https://subscribepage.io/oTSZQu