Tag: nonduality

The Courage of Radical Openness

Seeing others as thyself is not a moral instruction. It is a perceptual shift. A reorientation of how reality is registered once the reflex to divide dissolves.

Eyes wide open does not mean naïve seeing. It means perception unclouded by projection. Faces are no longer screens for personal history, unmet needs, or inherited narratives. Another person appears as they are—complex, conditioned, luminous, conflicted—without being reduced to a role. Judgment loosens because clarity replaces assumption. Seeing becomes intimate without being invasive.

A heart wide open does not imply emotional excess or boundarylessness. It signals availability. The willingness to feel without selecting which feelings are permitted. Joy is allowed. Discomfort is allowed. Grief is allowed. Compassion emerges not as effort, but as resonance. Another’s pain is not absorbed as obligation, nor deflected as inconvenience. It is simply felt as part of the shared field of experience.

A mind wide open is not the absence of thought. It is freedom from fixation. Opinions lose their rigidity. Certainty softens. The need to be right gives way to the capacity to understand. This openness does not erase discernment; it refines it. Differences remain visible, but no longer threaten identity. Perspective becomes spacious enough to hold contradiction without collapse.

Seeing others as thyself does not blur individuality. It reveals its true context. Distinct lives, distinct stories, distinct expressions, arising within the same indivisible reality. Separation persists as appearance, not as truth. What dissolves is the belief that the boundary is absolute.

This way of seeing cannot be forced. Ethics alone cannot produce it. It unfolds naturally as identification loosens its grip on a singular point of view. The centre quietly falls away. What remains is not detachment, but intimacy without possession.

From this recognition, action changes. Speech becomes more careful, not from fear, but from sensitivity. Listening deepens because there is no urgency to defend a position. Even conflict transforms. Disagreement no longer requires dehumanization. Accountability no longer requires condemnation.

Seeing others as thyself is not about becoming better. It is about becoming honest. Honest about what has always been the case beneath habit and conditioning. No hierarchy of worth. No isolated self standing apart from the whole. Only different expressions of the same life, meeting itself again and again, through countless faces.

Morgan O. Smith

Get Your Free Copy of My Book, Bodhi in the Brain!

https://subscribepage.io/oTSZQu

When All Paths Become Transparent to Truth

At the super-integral level, perception no longer filters reality through allegiance. Vision widens beyond affiliation, beyond the need to defend a worldview or elevate one tradition over another. What becomes visible is not a synthesis manufactured by intellect, but a recognition born of depth: each religion, philosophy, system, culture, and tradition is responding to the same mystery from a different angle of approach.

Truth does not belong to any single framework. Frameworks belong to truth.

Each system carries a partial articulation shaped by time, language, geography, psychology, and collective need. When approached from within their own context, these systems often appear contradictory. When seen from depth, they are complementary gestures pointing toward what cannot be fully captured. Disagreement dissolves not because differences disappear, but because the compulsion to absolutize any one perspective falls away.

Super-integral awareness does not flatten distinctions. It clarifies them. Christianity speaks the language of incarnation and surrender. Buddhism articulates emptiness and liberation from grasping. Advaita reveals the non-separation of Self and reality. Indigenous traditions speak through land, ancestry, and cyclical intelligence. Science maps measurable patterns of the cosmos. Psychology explores the architecture of the inner world. Each is precise within its domain. None is sufficient alone.

At this level, conflict between systems is understood as a category error. Arguments arise when symbols are mistaken for the reality they reference. Beliefs are defended as ends rather than as lenses. Super-integral seeing restores humility to knowing. It recognizes that every map is provisional and every language incomplete.

What shifts most profoundly is identity. No longer rooted in belief structures, identity relaxes into presence itself. From there, one can enter any tradition without needing to convert, reject, or appropriate. A Christian prayer, a Sufi poem, a Zen koan, a Vedantic inquiry, or a scientific equation can all be met directly, without friction. Meaning reveals itself through resonance rather than comparison.

This level of seeing does not erase devotion. It deepens it. Devotion moves from loyalty to a form toward reverence for the source animating all forms. Practice becomes fluid, responsive, and contextual. Wisdom expresses itself through discernment rather than doctrine.

Super-integral awareness is not an achievement of accumulation. It arises through subtraction, through the gradual release of identification with position, certainty, and hierarchy. What remains is a capacity to listen deeply, to recognize truth wherever it appears, and to allow contradiction to coexist without collapse.

Here, unity is not an idea. It is a lived recognition that difference is how the infinite explores itself.

Morgan O. Smith

Get Your Free Copy of My Book, Bodhi in the Brain!

https://subscribepage.io/oTSZQu

Nothing Is Not Hidden

“Nothing” is what it appears to be. The difficulty is not its subtlety, but our resistance to the obvious. Bias does not distort reality by adding complexity; it obscures by insisting that something more must be there.

The mind is conditioned to hunt for substance. It scans experience for objects, causes, meanings, and conclusions. When it encounters absence, silence, or emptiness, it assumes a failure of perception rather than the possibility that absence itself is the disclosure. Nothing is dismissed as a placeholder, a gap waiting to be filled, instead of recognized as complete.

Bias enters quietly. It wears the mask of intelligence, spirituality, and discernment. It whispers that truth must be profound, layered, or difficult to access. It suggests that what is immediately present cannot be ultimate, because it does not feel earned. Yet this assumption is precisely what blocks seeing.

Nothing does not hide behind form. It is revealed as form. Every sensation, thought, and emotion arises from it without leaving it. The error lies in expecting Nothing to announce itself as an object among objects. It does not compete for attention. It is the condition allowing attention to appear at all.

Seeking reinforces the bias. The seeker assumes a distance between what is and what should be known. That distance is imagined. Nothing is already fully exposed, but the demand for interpretation overlays it with concepts, metaphysics, and personal narratives. The obvious becomes invisible because it lacks drama.

Bias also clings to continuity. It prefers stable identities, persistent meanings, and coherent stories. Nothing threatens these preferences, not by opposing them, but by showing they were never fixed to begin with. The mind resists this not out of fear of annihilation, but out of loyalty to familiarity.

Seeing Nothing requires no refinement of perception. It requires the cessation of interference. When bias relaxes, what remains is not a revelation, but an acknowledgment. Nothing stands as it always has—unconcealed, ordinary, and sufficient.

No transformation is required to meet it. Only the willingness to stop arguing with what is already clear.

Morgan O. Smith

Get Your Free Copy of My Book, Bodhi in the Brain!

https://subscribepage.io/oTSZQu

Existence Is Not the Measure

The statement “God exists” sounds reverent, yet it quietly diminishes what it claims to honour. Existence is not a neutral category. It is a condition. To exist is to appear within time, to persist across duration, to occupy a framework where before and after apply. Existence implies location, sequence, and limit.

God, if the word is to mean anything absolute, cannot be confined to such a framework.

To say God exists already places God inside something else. Time becomes the container. Space becomes the stage. Existence becomes the rule God must obey. That framing does not exalt God; it reduces God to an object among other objects, distinguished only by scale or power.

A more precise statement unsettles most theists:
God does not exist.

Not because God is absent, unreal, or lacking. Quite the opposite. God is beyond the category of existence altogether. Existence belongs to the realm of manifestation. God is not a thing that manifests; God is that by which manifestation is possible at all.

Existence requires time. Something exists now, or then, or for a while. God, described as eternal, cannot be stretched across moments. Eternity is not infinite time; it is the absence of time. When time disappears, the verb “to exist” loses its footing.

Yet the paradox deepens further.

Non-existence seems to offer an escape. If God does not exist, perhaps God is non-existent. But non-existence remains a conceptual category. It can be named, contrasted, negated. It operates within the same logical field as existence. Both rely on distinction. Both appear only where something can be opposed to something else.

If non-existence is conceivable, it already participates in being. A possibility that is truly nothing cannot even be held in thought. The moment non-existence is entertained, it has already entered presence.

Here the framework collapses.

God, said to be beyond existence, must also be beyond non-existence. Whatever transcends both cannot be limited by either. Existence and non-existence become expressions rather than boundaries. Time and space arise as localized conditions within something that never enters them.

And this includes belief itself.

To hold a belief about God’s existence, to deny it, or even to question it, must occur within existence. Belief requires a thinker. Thought requires duration. Opinion requires perspective. Every stance taken for or against God is already operating inside the very field it attempts to define or negate. The debate itself belongs to manifestation.

The claim “God exists” is therefore not wrong ; it is partial. It refers only to the aspects of reality that appear within time and space: galaxies, minds, causes, effects, events. These are not separate from God, but they are not the whole either.

God is not an entity within existence. Existence is an activity within God.

Once this is seen, the opposition between theism and atheism dissolves. The atheist rejects a God who exists as an object. The theist defends that object. Both remain bound to the same assumption: that God must exist to be real.

Reality does not require existence as a predicate. Existence is something reality does, not something it is.

Nothing stands outside this. Nothing escapes it. Nothing contradicts it.

Existence is all there is; and what is cannot be reduced to existing.

Morgan O. Smith

Get Your Free Copy of My Book, Bodhi in the Brain!

https://subscribepage.io/oTSZQu

One and the Same

Death is often treated as an ending, a full stop placed at the edge of meaning. Birth, by contrast, is framed as a beginning, the arrival of something new into an already existing world. These assumptions feel natural, yet they rest on a quiet misunderstanding, one that dissolves when examined closely.

Nothing truly ends. Nothing truly begins.

Every form that appears does so by way of disappearance. Every arrival is carried on the back of a vanishing. The body emerges because countless cells die. Stars ignite because other stars collapse. Thought arises because silence gives way. Creation never stands apart from dissolution; they occur as a single movement, mistaken for two.

The universe itself is not exempt from this law. Should the cosmos dissolve entirely, space folding back into silence, time releasing its grip, matter unbinding, nothing would be lost. That collapse would not be annihilation. It would be intimacy taken to its extreme.

What remains when everything disappears?

You.

Not the personal identity shaped by memory or biology, but the condition that made the universe possible in the first place. Awareness does not arrive after existence; existence arrives within awareness. The world is born where perception happens. When the universe vanishes, what stands revealed is not absence, but the one to whom absence appears.

Every night offers a quiet rehearsal. Deep sleep erases the world without effort. No stars, no body, no history, yet being does not flicker out. Something remains unmistakably present, though nothing can be pointed to. That presence is not waiting for the universe; the universe is waiting for it.

Cosmic death follows the same logic. When all structure dissolves, what shines through is not void, but origin. Birth does not just occur inside the universe; the universe occurs inside birth.

This is why death feels so intimate. It threatens the loss of what was never fundamental. It removes what was added, not what is essential. What dies is the scenery. What is born is the one who was never inside the scene to begin with.

Every ending reveals the same truth from a different angle. The death of a moment births awareness of time. The death of identity births presence. The death of the cosmos births the one who was always watching it happen.

Death and birth are not opposites. They are the same doorway, approached from different sides.

And you are not what passes through.

You are what remains when the door itself disappears.

Morgan O. Smith

Get Your Free Copy of My Book, Bodhi in the Brain!

https://subscribepage.io/oTSZQu

Presence Does Not Come or Go

Presence does not arrive with birth, nor does it depart with death. It does not wait for time to pass or moments to accumulate. Presence is already here; before thought names it, before memory reaches backward, before imagination leans forward. Whatever appears does so within presence, not alongside it.

The past feels real only because it is remembered now. The future feels compelling only because it is anticipated now. Thought moves, images shift, emotions rise and fall, yet each movement occurs against the same unmoving fact: presence has never left. Even the idea of being elsewhere is something that appears here.

Bodies change. Identities dissolve and reform. Worlds expand and collapse. Physics tells us that matter and energy do not vanish; they transform. Even more striking, what we call matter accounts for only a fraction of what exists. The vast remainder: dark energy, dark matter, remains unseen, unnamed, yet undeniably present. Absence itself never escapes presence. Non-existence, if such a thing could be said to occur, would still be known as present.

Death, then, does not challenge presence. It only challenges continuity of form. If awareness continues, presence continues. If awareness ceases, the cessation itself is not outside presence. Nothing steps beyond it. Nothing escapes it. There is no edge where presence stops and something else begins.

Impermanence governs every form. Thoughts change. Bodies age. Stars burn out. Universes may even end. Yet impermanence depends on something that does not change. Change can only be noticed because presence remains steady enough to register it. Movement requires a stillness that is never lost.

Presence does not belong to you, yet nothing is more intimate. It is not located inside or outside. Those distinctions arise within it. Every attempt to grasp presence turns it into an object and misses it. Presence cannot be held because it is what is holding everything else.

Even the end of everything would not be an end of presence. It would simply be presence without form. No time. No matter. No universe. Still present.

Nothing needs to be added to this. Nothing needs to be resolved. Presence is not a conclusion; it is the condition that allows conclusions to appear and disappear.

And it has never not been here.

Morgan O. Smith

Get Your Free Copy of My Book, Bodhi in the Brain!

https://subscribepage.io/oTSZQu

When “I” Speaks After Awakening

After a nondual recognition, language returns before identity does. Words reappear, grammar resumes, and the pronoun “I” steps back into the conversation—not as proof of separation, but as a functional bridge. Speech requires a subject. Silence does not.

Many misunderstand this moment. Hearing someone say “I experienced awakening,” the listener assumes a reinstalled ego, a self reclaiming authorship. Yet what actually occurs is translation. Experience moves through the narrow gate of language, and language has only a few handles to grab reality with. “I” becomes one of them.

Avoiding the word altogether often creates greater confusion. Saying “nothing happened” suggests absence rather than transcendence. It implies insignificance, when the opposite is true. Something fell away so completely that no object remained to point at. Language struggles most where realization is most total.

A distinction helps here.

Turiya refers to the formless witness; the ever-present awareness that observes waking, dreaming, and deep sleep without entering any of them. It is silent, empty, untouched. This is not an experience in time but the condition in which time appears. Many awakenings stabilize here, and rightly so.

Turiyatitta goes further. Even the stance of witnessing dissolves. No observer remains to stand apart from what is observed. Awareness recognizes itself as the only reality there is. No inside, no outside, no vantage point left. This is nonduality without remainder.

When speech arises from this recognition, “I” no longer refers to a psychological centre. It does not point to a thinker, a chooser, or a personal narrative. It points to the Self; Para Brahman—without division. Atman, ego, witness, world collapse into a single field, not blended, not unified, but revealed as never having been separate.

The same word is used. The referent has changed.

Confusion arises when listeners assume the old meaning still applies. The word “I” sounds familiar, so it is treated as familiar. Yet meaning does not live in the word. Meaning lives in the depth from which the word emerges.

A realized individual does not abandon language. Language is abandoned as identity. What remains is utility. Communication happens. Teaching happens. Relationship happens. None of it reinstates separation.

The paradox resolves itself quietly: the ego can say “I,” and the Absolute can say “I.” Only one of them believes it is something.

Silence knows the difference. Speech borrows it.

Morgan O. Smith

Get Your Free Copy of My Book, Bodhi in the Brain!

https://subscribepage.io/oTSZQu

Ego Death vs. Super-Ego Death

When individuality dissolves—and when the collective mask collapses

Ego death has become familiar language within spiritual circles. It often refers to the collapse of the personal story; the felt sense of “me” as a separate centre of control, identity, and continuity. Thoughts still arise, sensations still move, yet the claim of ownership quietly disappears. Experience continues without a narrator insisting it belongs to someone.

This event can feel absolute. Many report vastness, silence, love without an object, or a direct recognition of being awareness itself. The personal mask falls away, and with it the emotional gravity of self-protection, shame, pride, and comparison. Life continues, yet it is no longer filtered through the need to defend or improve a fictional self.

Still, something subtle often remains.

Beneath the personal ego sits another structure, far less discussed and far more persistent: the super-ego of the collective. This is not merely morality or social conditioning. It is the internalized voice of humanity itself; the inherited myths, hierarchies, spiritual ideals, political narratives, and cultural agreements that define what counts as real, good, awakened, successful, or worthy.

Ego death removes the personal actor. Super-ego death removes the stage.

Super-ego death is not about becoming rebellious or rejecting society. It is the dissolution of the unseen authority that claims reality must conform to shared agreements. This includes spiritual identities just as much as material ones. The enlightened persona, the wise teacher, the healed one, the awakened exemplar, all of these belong to the collective ego, even when the personal ego has already fallen.

This is why some awakenings still feel constrained. Freedom is tasted, yet behavior unconsciously bends to invisible rules. One no longer needs approval as an individual, yet still seeks legitimacy through lineage, doctrine, community, or role. Silence is known, yet language is chosen carefully to avoid exile from the group.

Super-ego death arrives when even the collective lens loses its authority.

No tradition holds the final word. No framework owns truth. No spiritual map is mistaken for the territory it points toward. Morality is no longer outsourced to consensus. Meaning no longer depends on agreement. What remains is not isolation, but radical intimacy; life meeting itself without mediation.

This does not produce chaos. It produces clarity.

Action becomes responsive rather than obedient. Compassion arises without ideology. Ethics emerge organically, shaped by direct contact rather than inherited commandments. One may still participate in society, teach, lead, love, and create, but without the invisible pressure to represent anything.

Personal ego death says, “I am not who I thought I was.”
Super-ego death says, “Reality is not what we collectively agreed it must be.”

Very few speak from this territory because it offers no badge. Nothing can be claimed. No position can be stabilized. Language points, then dissolves. Authority evaporates.

What remains cannot be organized, branded, or defended.

Life continues, unowned, unruled, uncontained, expressing itself freely, without asking permission from the individual or the crowd.

Morgan O. Smith

Get Your Free Copy of My Book, Bodhi in the Brain!

https://subscribepage.io/oTSZQu

The Greatest Expression

You’re Already Expressing the Greatest Expression and Don’t Even Know It

Nothing needs to be added to you. Nothing is missing. The most extraordinary expression possible is already happening, quietly, without effort, before any attempt to improve it.

Existence does not wait for permission to appear. It does not consult identity, achievement, or spiritual progress. It expresses itself as breath, sensation, perception, memory, confusion, clarity, longing, boredom, and awe, all without ever stepping outside itself. What you call you is one of its gestures, not its source.

Search often begins with the assumption that something essential has not yet arrived. That assumption creates movement, effort, discipline, and endless refinement. Yet the impulse to seek arises from the same field that is supposedly being sought. Awareness looks for awareness. Being attempts to arrive at being. The loop sustains itself through misunderstanding.

Existence is not something you perform well or poorly. It is not a role to master or a state to stabilize. It is already complete before thought comments on it. Every attempt to improve it belongs to the play of expression, not to a lack that needs correcting.

Notice how little effort is required to exist. Heartbeat continues without consultation. Sensations arise without rehearsal. Thoughts appear without being summoned. Even the sense of being a separate doer arrives spontaneously. None of this requires your management.

What feels ordinary carries no deficiency. The mundane is not a lesser version of reality waiting to become sacred. Washing dishes, forgetting names, feeling tired, feeling inspired, each appears from the same depth. Existence does not divide itself into meaningful and meaningless moments.

Awakening is not an upgrade layered onto life. It is the recognition that life never needed upgrading. What falls away is not existence, but the belief that existence must become something else to be valid.

Trying to express your “highest self” quietly assumes you are not already doing so. That belief fractures what is whole. The greatest expression cannot be improved because it is not a product. It is the fact of appearing at all.

Nothing needs to stop. Nothing needs to be transcended. Even misunderstanding belongs. Even confusion is permitted. Even the desire to arrive somewhere else is part of what is already complete.

The miracle hides in plain sight because it has never announced itself. Existence does not sparkle to prove its worth. It simply continues, endlessly creative, endlessly sufficient, endlessly itself, appearing as you, without asking whether you recognize it.

Morgan O. Smith

Get Your Free Copy of My Book, Bodhi in the Brain!

https://subscribepage.io/oTSZQu

Learning to Become the Whole Picture

A Meditation Exercise

Most of us move through life identified with a very small point of reference: this body, this role, this story. This blog explores a contemplative exercise that systematically expands perception from the smallest point imaginable to the largest conceivable whole. Step by step, it trains the mind to release its attachment to identity, scale, and centre. Practiced over time, this form of meditation prepares awareness for the possibility of non-separation, where the sense of being a separate observer gives way to experiencing reality as a single, undivided whole.

A dot appears.
Small. Definite. Easy to hold.

That dot rests on paper.
Paper rests on a desk.
Desk belongs to a room.
Room belongs to a house.
House stands on a street.
Street unfolds into a community.
Community expands into a city.
City into a province or state.
Province into a country.
Country into a planet.

The planet moves within a solar system.
The solar system turns within a galaxy.
The galaxy drifts among countless others.
The universe opens into immeasurable depth.
Depth gives way to the possibility of many universes.

Awareness keeps widening.

At some point, the exercise stops being imaginative.
Perspective shifts from accumulation to release.
Each expansion loosens attachment to the centre point, once called “me.”

Identity thins out.

Roles dissolve first.
Status follows.
History fades.
Gender, race, profession, success, failure, each quietly falls away.

No effort required.
Only patience and repetition.

What remains does not feel like loss.
What remains feels like scale.

Meditation, practiced this way, trains the nervous system to tolerate immensity.
Mind learns not to contract when boundaries disappear.
Attention becomes flexible enough to hold paradox without panic.

Something subtle happens over years.
The observer no longer stands apart from the observed.
The dot never vanished; it was never separate from the page, the desk, the room, or the universe.

When awakening arrives, should it arrive, the shock is not annihilation.
The shock is familiarity.

Nothing new appears.
Only the removal of a mistaken centre.

Preparation does not guarantee realization.
Preparation simply reduces resistance.

Five years of daily practice is not a demand.
Five years is a gesture of seriousness.
A declaration that truth matters more than comfort.

Eventually, there is no one imagining the multiverse.
The multiverse imagines itself; without edges, without names, without division.

Silence holds everything.

Morgan O. Smith

Get Your Free Copy of My Book, Bodhi in the Brain!

https://subscribepage.io/oTSZQu