Knowing the Absolute from Every Angle

The Absolute cannot be grasped by standing in a single place.

Any attempt to reduce it to one perspective—personal, relational, objective, mystical, or philosophical, inevitably distorts it. What gets mistaken for ultimate truth is often just a partial orientation mistaken for the whole.

To know the Absolute at full capacity requires more than a peak realization. It requires total perspectival inclusion.

From the first person, the Absolute is immediate presence; being as oneself. From the second person, it appears as intimacy, devotion, and encounter. From the third person, it becomes structure, law, and observable order. Each of these reveals something true, yet none is sufficient on its own.

A deeper shift occurs when perspective itself is examined.

The fourth perspective dissolves the centre. Experience continues, but ownership drops away. Awareness no longer belongs to anyone. Reality is no longer happening to a self or for a self. Knowing remains, yet no knower can be found.

Then even this gives way.

The fifth perspective removes the need for a field, a witness, or an explanatory ground altogether. The question of where experience occurs loses relevance. Nothing collapses. Nothing transcends. The demand for a final position simply falls apart.

At this point, God is no longer approached as an object of belief, a presence to merge with, or an awareness to stabilize in. God is known as that which remains valid across every mode of knowing without requiring allegiance to any of them.

This knowing must also scale developmentally.

Ego-centric concern gives way to ethnocentric identity, which yields to world-centric ethics, which eventually opens into kosmocentric inclusion. Each stage expands care, responsibility, and comprehension. None invalidates the others. Each must be seen through without being erased.

The same applies to the I, We, It, and Its dimensions of reality. Subjective experience, shared meaning, objective systems, and interobjective networks all reveal aspects of the Absolute. Excluding any one of them creates imbalance. Absolutizing any one of them creates delusion.

States of consciousness contribute their own disclosures. Waking reveals form and function. Dreaming reveals imagination and symbolic depth. Dreamless sleep reveals the absence of content. The witness reveals continuity without identity. Nonduality reveals the inseparability of all of it. None of these states owns the truth. Each exposes a different facet of what cannot be reduced.

Lines of development add further resolution. Cognitive clarity without emotional maturity distorts insight. Moral development without metaphysical depth flattens reality. Spiritual realization without psychological integration fragments embodiment. The Absolute is not known through excellence in one line alone.

Enlightenment, then, is not a single realization frozen in time.

It is the capacity to recognize the Absolute through every perspective without mistaking any perspective for the Absolute itself.

Such knowing does not claim finality. It does not announce arrival. It does not need to defend itself. It functions fluidly; able to speak personally, relationally, objectively, impersonally, and without position; depending on what the moment requires.

God is not found by climbing higher.
God is known by nothing being excluded.

Morgan O. Smith

AI for Wellness and Spirituality Summit

February 9 & 10, 2026

https://aiforwellnessandspirituality.com/mosm

Beyond Nonduality?

The Illusion of Going Further

Some spiritual teachers claim they have gone “beyond” nonduality, as if it were a stepping stone toward something greater. Yet the very notion of “beyond” creates an opposite, “before” or “within,” and the moment opposites arise, duality has returned.

Absolute monism allows for no such division. The singularity of reality does not exist as a point to be crossed or a boundary to be passed. It is not somewhere else, waiting on the other side of an imagined line. If you think you have travelled beyond it, you are still standing in the arena of conceptual thought, where the mind measures one thing against another.

In truth, the Absolute is not a destination, and it is not a stage in an unfolding ladder. It does not sit opposite to multiplicity; it holds multiplicity and its absence equally. It neither favours unity nor rejects separation. Both “beyond” and “before,” both “within” and “without,” dissolve in the same undivided field.

What remains is not something that can be claimed, owned, or transcended. It is self-evident Being, the source and container of every movement, stillness, and paradox. You cannot reach it, because you never left it.

Morgan O. Smith

Get Your Free Copy of My Book, Bodhi in the Brain!

https://subscribepage.io/oTSZQu

The Dance of Consciousness

How Traits and States Influence Each Other

Introduction:
In the realm of philosophy and neuroscience, the nature of consciousness has long been a subject of intense scrutiny. As we delve into the complex interplay between traits of consciousness and states of consciousness, we embark on a thought-provoking journey that explores how these facets of our mind shape and are shaped by each other.

Part I: The Essence of Traits of Consciousness
Traits of consciousness refer to the enduring qualities and patterns that define an individual’s cognitive, emotional, and behavioural makeup. These traits form the bedrock of one’s personality, shaping how they perceive the world, process information, and interact with others. From introversion to openness, resilience to empathy, traits of consciousness provide a unique lens through which individuals experience their existence.

Part II: Unraveling States of Consciousness
States of consciousness, on the other hand, are transient and ever-changing mental conditions. These states can range from heightened awareness during moments of meditation or creative inspiration to altered states induced by substances or intense emotional experiences. States of consciousness are like ripples on the surface of a vast ocean, reflecting our immediate perceptions and inner states.

Part III: The Bidirectional Influence

At first glance, it might appear that traits and states of consciousness operate independently. However, upon closer examination, we discover the profound bidirectional influence they exert on each other.

1. Traits Shaping States:

Our enduring traits of consciousness lay the foundation for how we perceive and react to various states. For instance, a highly empathetic individual might experience deeper connections with others during states of heightened compassion or love. Similarly, a person with a predisposition to anxiety may be more prone to states of distress during challenging situations.

2. States Shaping Traits:

The fluidity of consciousness states can leave lasting imprints on our traits. Profound transformative experiences, such as spiritual awakenings or near-death encounters, can lead to significant shifts in an individual’s personality and worldview. Moreover, states like mindfulness and meditation can foster positive traits like patience and self-awareness.

Part IV: The Dance of Consciousness
As the dance unfolds, we realize that consciousness is not static but rather a dynamic process, constantly in flux. Traits and states intertwine, shaping and reshaping one another in an intricate and evolving dance.

Conclusion:
The relationship between traits and states of consciousness is a fascinating exploration of the human mind’s complexity. Acknowledging this interconnectedness can empower us to cultivate positive traits while embracing the ebb and flow of transient states. As we embrace the intricacies of our consciousness, we embark on a journey of self-discovery, leading us to a deeper understanding of ourselves and the world around us. Remember, we are not merely passive observers of our consciousness; we are active participants in its unfolding story.

Morgan O. Smith

Yinnergy Meditation & My Book, Bodhi in the Brain…Available Now!

https://linktr.ee/morganosmith