Tag: Western philosophy

Absolute Monism

Unraveling the Tapestry of Oneness

The vast universe, with its manifold entities and infinite complexities, often bewilders human minds. Philosophers and thinkers from time immemorial have grappled with questions about the nature of existence and the ultimate reality. One profound idea that surfaces recurrently is that of Absolute Monism: the belief that beneath the apparent multiplicity, there is but one undivided reality. Let’s take a deeper look into this captivating worldview.

### A Universe from One Thread

At the heart of Absolute Monism lies the assertion that all differences and diversities we perceive are mere illusions. This assertion may seem contradictory to our daily experiences. After all, isn’t the world teeming with diversity?

Yet, this is where Eastern and Western philosophies converge. Ancient Hindu scriptures speak of *Brahman* as the ultimate, undifferentiated reality. The Hindu philosophy of Advaita Vedanta encapsulates this belief by stating that the world’s multiplicity, driven by *Maya*, is an illusion. Meanwhile, in the West, the philosopher Spinoza proposed that God and Nature are two names for the same reality, implying a singular, infinite substance. These ideas, separated by continents, come together to champion a singular reality beneath the apparent diversity.

### Seeing Beyond the Illusion

The concept of illusion is integral to understanding monism. In life, appearances can often be deceiving. A mirage in the desert, a rainbow after the rain, and even our reflection in the water are all illusions. If such simple things can deceive our senses, might it be possible that our entire perception of diverse reality is similarly mistaken?

*Mysticism* has been one avenue through which individuals across cultures have described experiences consistent with Absolute Monism. The interconnectedness of all things, a theme found in the tapestry of monism, speaks to the heart, nudging us to see beyond divisions and differences.

### Implications for Modern Times

If Absolute Monism holds that all is one, then what does this mean for us in the present age, surrounded by divisive forces and fragmented views?

Firstly, on an ethical plane, it implies that harm inflicted upon one is harm to the entirety. This perspective could drastically alter how we approach interpersonal relationships, environmental concerns, and global crises. If we truly internalize this philosophy, then every act of kindness and harm has far-reaching consequences.

Secondly, it brings to the fore the importance of self-realization. In many monistic traditions, the realization of this singular truth is the end goal, bringing about an end to suffering.

Lastly, it sparks curiosity about the nature of our universe. With advancements in modern physics and cosmology, we find theories that echo monistic thoughts. The Big Bang, for instance, suggests that everything we see, touch, and experience emerges from a singular point.

### Embracing Diversity within Unity

Absolute Monism does not negate the value of diversity. Rather, it calls for a deeper understanding. Imagine a tapestry. Up close, one can see the myriad of colours, textures, and patterns. But from a distance, it’s one cohesive artwork. Similarly, monism asks us to appreciate the individual threads while recognizing the grand design.

In an age teeming with division, perhaps the idea of Absolute Monism can be the bridge that reminds us of our interconnectedness. As we stand at the cusp of profound global challenges, this ancient philosophy might just hold the key to a unified, harmonious future.

—

Embracing the ideas of Absolute Monism requires introspection and openness. Whether you fully resonate with its tenets or not, it undoubtedly serves as a beacon, guiding us toward unity, understanding, and profound interconnectedness.

Morgan O. Smith

Yinnergy Meditation & My Book, Bodhi in the Brain…Available Now!

https://linktr.ee/morganosmith

A Meeting of East and West

Advaita Vedanta and Ken Wilber’s Four Quadrants

As we navigate through life’s labyrinth, we encounter myriad philosophical viewpoints designed to offer us clarity about the nature of reality. Two such perspectives – one rooted in ancient Eastern spirituality, Advaita Vedanta, and the other a more contemporary Western theory, Ken Wilber’s Integral Theory – provide us with intriguing interpretive lenses. While appearing distinct, when juxtaposed, they unfold a captivating dialogue, revealing the interconnectedness of diverse paths of wisdom.

**Non-Duality: The Heart of Advaita Vedanta**

At the core of Advaita Vedanta lies the profound principle of non-duality. The term ‘Advaita’ translates to ‘not two’, pointing towards the notion of unity beneath apparent multiplicity. According to this philosophy, all phenomena – whether perceived as separate entities or diverse experiences – are manifestations of a singular absolute reality known as Brahman.

This philosophy posits that the perceived distinction between the individual self (Atman) and the ultimate reality (Brahman) is an illusion (Maya), born out of ignorance (Avidya). The journey of spiritual awakening in Advaita Vedanta is about transcending this illusion, recognizing the non-dual nature of existence, where the Atman and Brahman are not separate but one.

**Ken Wilber’s Four Quadrants: A Comprehensive Map of Reality**

Ken Wilber’s Integral Theory, particularly the Four Quadrants model, offers a different but complementary perspective. Wilber presents a holistic map of reality, dividing it into four quadrants: Individual Interior (consciousness), Individual Exterior (behaviour), Collective Interior (culture), and Collective Exterior (society). Each quadrant represents an integral part of our existence and must be considered to understand reality holistically.

**The Interplay: Advaita Vedanta and Four Quadrants**

Drawing parallels between Advaita Vedanta and the Four Quadrants can create a fascinating synthesis of Eastern and Western thought.

The Upper Left Quadrant (Individual-Interior) aligns with the individual’s subjective experience, mirroring the Advaita exploration of Atman. The Upper Right Quadrant (Individual-Exterior) encapsulates the physical manifestation of the individual, aligning with the Advaita concept that even our physical existence is a manifestation of Brahman.

The Lower Left Quadrant (Collective-Interior) represents shared beliefs and cultures, resonating with the Advaita perspective that cultural differences are superficial, and at a deeper level, unity prevails. The Lower Right Quadrant (Collective-Exterior) mirrors societal structures, all manifestations of the same non-dual reality.

From the Advaita viewpoint, the division of the four quadrants are themselves expressions of Maya, as they create apparent separations where none ultimately exist. They are valuable tools for understanding and navigating the world but do not represent the deepest truth of non-duality.

**Uniting Perspectives: A Path to Enlightenment**

Exploring the intersection of Advaita Vedanta and Ken Wilber’s Four Quadrants offers a richer understanding of reality, harmonizing subjective and objective, individual and collective, Eastern spirituality and Western theory. As we understand that the lines dividing these quadrants are more porous than they seem, we move closer to the non-dual truth of Advaita – that beneath apparent diversity, unity pervades.

At a time when division and fragmentation are rampant, this synthesis could offer a path toward the kind of transcendental insight that can bridge divides, fostering a deeper sense of interconnectedness and wholeness. After all, as Advaita Vedanta teaches us, beneath the surface of multiplicity, we are ‘not two’ but one. As we embrace the wisdom of the four quadrants, we might just find ourselves taking a step closer to that unity, opening ourselves to a richer, more holistic understanding of the world.

Morgan O. Smith

Yinnergy Meditation & My Book, Bodhi in the Brain…Available Now!

https://linktr.ee/morganosmith